News come in all forms
and shapes. While most filter them according to content and subjective
assessment of interest, why not try and introduce some objective measures of
each news item? I propose several relative easy and simple to implement
criteria of assessment by which news can be categorized and then filtered or
segmented.
The first is the number of people it reports on. While
this seems like a crude measure of importance, a news item related to one
person that got rehabilitated (no matter who that person is) objectively is
less important than famine influencing several million people. By tagging each
news item on the number of people reported on (or a rough estimate thereof),
one can slice news to people-importance.
The second is monetary.
The cost of the item reported, either in tax-payer money or cost of
reconstruction, cost of change, influence on GDP, etc. This gives a rough estimate
on the financial effect of the news item. Mind you that not only financial news
should be assessed by this measure, but rather every news item. Thus every
natural disaster or car accident, every joyous event or festival should be
tagged with a monetary measure, such that the influence of the reported item on
finance can be immediately filtered.
The third is the
political hierarchical level of the news item. By this I mean how up does the
news item reach? Obviously, presidential reports are pretty way up, but
senators, mayors and even local news can be rated according to objective
measures of hierarchy, e.g. how many people between the reported people
involved and the president. This way one can assess the political influence the news
item has.
One can introduce other
important objective measures of news items, e.g. technological measures, social
measures etc. This way, one can filter, select, evaluate and relate to news
items not only based on content, but actual measures of influence. This way news
media can be assessed on the importance of their items. Obviously, this is not
intended to replace the content filters but rather augment them. It would be
nice to see how much prime-time news are actually about important things.
No comments:
Post a Comment